Relationships are built on trust, communication, and intimacy, yet trauma often shakes these foundations in ways that can feel invisible but deeply disruptive. When someone carries unresolved pain from the past, it doesn’t remain isolated; it seeps into how they see themselves, how they interact with others, and how they respond to moments of closeness or conflict. What begins as an internal wound often becomes a relational challenge.

Last Saturday, I delivered a training session on trauma and its effects on relationships to members of AWiB, who came from diverse organizations. Some participants were already familiar with the concept of trauma, while others were encountering it for the first time; yet all had experienced it in one form or another. In that discussion, we explored how psychologists often distinguish between “big T” trauma and “small t” trauma. Big T trauma refers to events such as war, displacement, post‑traumatic stress, rape, major accidents, or physical assault, experiences that can lead to disorders and dissociation. Small t trauma, on the other hand, encompasses childhood adversities and other painful situations that remain lodged in memory. These experiences may not appear catastrophic on the surface, yet they continue to shape our lives, influencing how we generalize or personalize triggers that affect communication, relationships, and emotional regulation.

At the emotional level, individuals affected by small t trauma may find themselves oscillating between hypervigilance and numbness. Being constantly on guard can make every interaction feel like a potential threat, while emotional detachment can leave partners feeling shut out. These responses, though protective in origin, create distance in relationships. Adding to this, many people struggle with negative self‑beliefs, convinced they are unworthy of love or destined to be hurt again. Such beliefs erode confidence and make it difficult to accept care, even when it is freely offered. This inner struggle often spills outward, as heightened emotional reactivity turns minor disagreements into major ruptures, leaving both partners feeling misunderstood.

These emotional challenges naturally extend into issues of trust and safety. If someone has experienced neglect or repeated invalidation, they may carry a lingering suspicion into adult relationships. Even when a partner is supportive, doubt can remain. Alongside this distrust often comes a fear of abandonment, which may manifest as clinginess or, paradoxically, avoidance. The push and pull between needing reassurance and fearing rejection creates instability that both partners must navigate. Vulnerability, which is essential for intimacy, can feel unsafe, leading individuals to keep emotional walls high. This protective stance may prevent deeper bonding, even when closeness is desired.

When trust is fragile, communication suffers. Many people withdraw during conflict, retreating into silence to avoid pain. Others find themselves escalating arguments quickly, reacting with intensity that feels overwhelming to both partners. And some silence their needs entirely, afraid that expressing boundaries or desires will lead to rejection. Over time, this silence breeds resentment and prevents authentic connection. What begins as protection ends up reinforcing isolation.

The strain inevitably spills into intimacy. Physical closeness can be difficult, especially when past experiences have made touch feel unsafe or triggering. Even without such associations, stress and hypervigilance can interfere with relaxation and bonding. Emotional intimacy is equally vulnerable. People may struggle to feel safe enough to open up, creating a sense of distance that partners notice but don’t always understand. Without awareness, these patterns can repeat across relationships, as unresolved trauma leads individuals to unconsciously recreate familiar dynamics. Psychologists call this repetition compulsion, reliving old wounds in new contexts, such as choosing distant partners that reinforce feelings of abandonment.

Trauma also profoundly shapes patterns of attachment. Early experiences of neglect, criticism, or inconsistent caregiving can disrupt the ability to form secure bonds, leaving individuals oscillating between anxious attachment, marked by fear of abandonment and a constant need for reassurance, or avoidant attachment, where closeness feels unsafe and distance becomes a protective strategy. In adult relationships, these attachment styles often play out as cycles of clinging and withdrawal, making intimacy fragile and trust difficult to sustain. Recognizing how trauma influences attachment is essential, because it explains not only why people struggle with connection but also how healing can restore the capacity for secure, nurturing relationships.

These cycles can feel discouraging, yet recognizing them is the first step toward change. Awareness allows individuals to pause, reflect, and choose different responses rather than repeating old patterns. Healing requires more than recognition, however; it calls for intentional strategies and supportive environments. Counseling and trauma‑focused therapy provide tools to process experiences and regulate emotions, helping people move beyond survival mode. Healthy communication practices, such as expressing needs clearly and listening actively, foster trust and reduce misunderstandings. Supportive partners play a vital role too, offering empathy, patience, and consistency that rebuild safety over time.

Beyond individual and couple efforts, community support can make a profound difference. Peer groups and safe social networks reduce isolation, reminding people they are not alone in their struggles. Sharing experiences with others who understand trauma normalizes challenges and provides encouragement. Together, these pathways create opportunities to cultivate resilience and healthier relational dynamics.

Trauma does not only affect the individual directly experiencing it; it can ripple across generations. Psychologists describe this as intergenerational transmission of trauma, where unresolved pain, patterns of emotional regulation, and relational dynamics are unconsciously passed down. For example, a parent who grew up with criticism or neglect may struggle to provide consistent emotional safety for their own children. Even without intending harm, their heightened reactivity, avoidance, or mistrust can shape the child’s sense of security and attachment. Over time, these learned patterns become part of family culture, influencing how future generations communicate, trust, and connect. In this way, small “t” traumas, those everyday adversities and relational wounds can echo forward, shaping not only one relationship but entire family systems.

Recognizing this cycle is crucial, because awareness opens the door to change. When individuals begin to process their own experiences, they interrupt the transmission of pain and create space for healthier relational models. Healing is not only personal; it is generational. By cultivating empathy, practicing open communication, and seeking therapeutic support, people can rewrite the narrative for themselves and those who come after them.

Reflecting on the training I provided, the call to action is clear: let us take responsibility for understanding how trauma shapes our relationships, not with blame but with compassion. Each step toward awareness and healing, whether through therapy, supportive communities, or intentional communication, creates a ripple of resilience. By breaking cycles of mistrust and emotional distance, we not only strengthen our own connections but also offer future generations the gift of healthier, more secure relationships. Healing begins with us, and its impact extends far beyond.

By Dr. Seble Hailu

Share with Your Circle!